Improved technology has made occupancy sensors the most popular component light
control solution on the market. Both ceiling-mounted or wall-box occupancy sensors
survey a room through passive infrared, ultrasonic, or a combination of the
two technologies (dual-technology) to determine if a space is occupied. If the
sensor does not detect the presence of anyone after a preset amount of time,
the sensor will turn off the lights. When the space detects an occupant, lighting
will resume.
"Occupancy sensors are very effective at what they do, if they are applied
properly," says Baselici. Selection of the right type of sensors and their
mounting location can mean the difference between a major annoyance and a valued
energy saver. Passive infrared (PIR) occupancy sensors respond to the heat energy
emitted by humans and adjust lighting according to the detection of occupants
in a space. PIR sensors must have an unobstructed "line of sight"
to determine occupancy. For example, a wall-box PIR occupancy sensor in a restroom
will not "sense" individuals behind partition walls. These sensors
are most often employed in corridors, lobbies, or copy areas where large movements
are common.
Conversely, ultrasonic occupancy sensors detect occupancy by emitting sound
waves (at high, inaudible frequencies) that are reflected from a room's surfaces
back to the sensor. When there is motion in the space, the frequency of these
reflected waves is altered and lights are activated. Ultrasonic sensors are
more capable of detecting occupancy in areas with partitions and other obstructions.
However, the situation has to meet certain requirements (such as an enclosed
space with hard surfaces that will easily reflect sound waves). The benefit
of ultrasonic sensors is their ability to detect small movement, like a person
sitting at a desk typing. However, small air currents moving a curtain can also
trigger the system to activate lighting in an unoccupied space.
Dual-technology occupancy sensors combine both infrared and ultrasonic technology
at a higher cost. Thought to be "the best of both worlds," dual-technology
sensors minimize false on/offs.
Retrofit in some applications can be as simple as replacing a manual on/off
switch with a wall-box occupancy sensor. "If you can replace a wall switch
with an occupancy sensor, you can typically pay that back in three years,"
explains Alfred R. Borden IV, IALD member and president of The Lighting Practice,
Philadelphia. Regardless of whether wall-box or ceiling-mounted sensors are
selected for a space, serious consideration needs to be given to the sensors'
area of coverage and coverage pattern. Borden suggests that 30 days after an
installation, sensors should be checked and adjusted to make sure that they
are working as intended.
| Figure
2: Operating Cost Comparison: Private Office, 128
sq. ft. |
|
Performance
|
Base
Case
|
Occupancy
Sensors
|
Daylighting
|
Occupancy
Sensors + Daylighting
|
| Annual
Energy Use* |
450
kWh
|
340
kWh
|
330
kWh
|
250
kWh
|
| Annual
Energy Cost |
$33
|
$24
|
$24
|
$18
|
| Annual
Energy Cost Savings |
-
|
$9
|
$9
|
$15
|
|
*
Average daily "on" hours for wall switch is 14.7. Average daily occupied
hours for the office is 12.9.
|
Source:
US Dept of Energy
|
| Figure
3: Operating Cost Comparison: Open Office Area,
1,000 sq. ft. |
|
Performance
|
Base
Case
|
Time
Scheduling
|
Occupancy
Sensors
|
Daylighting
|
Time
Scheduling + Daylighting
|
| Annual
Energy Use* |
5,700
kWh
|
5,100
kWh
|
5,000
kWh
|
4,200
kWh
|
3,700
kWh
|
| Annual
Energy Cost |
$340
|
$305
|
$300
|
$250
|
$220
|
| Annual
Energy Cost Savings |
-
|
$35
|
$40
|
$90
|
$120
|
|
*
Average daily "on" hours for wall switch is 9.1. Average daily occupied
hours for the office is 6.8.
|
Source:
US Dept of Energy
|