Buildings Buzz - Voices from the Industry

BUILDINGS - Smarter Facilities Management

Featured Posts

Making Sense of Continuous Insulation

Posted on 8/30/2016 9:51 AM by Michael McAuley

Everyone instinctively knows that when you go outside on a cold day, you must zip your coat to stay warm. It doesn’t matter how thick the coat is, if it’s left open, your body heat will leak out. The same is true with building insulation – no matter its R-value (thermal performance), if insulation isn’t continuous throughout the building envelope like a zipped coat, heat will escape – wasting energy and money.

To help ensure well-insulated buildings, since 2012 the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) has required continuous insulation (CI) in the building envelope. The 2012 IECC prescribes how much insulation is required for each of the 8 U.S. climate zones, for various types of above grade walls, below grade walls, roofs and floors.

In addition to enhancing a building’s energy efficiency, CI helps reduce moisture damage in the building envelope by lowering condensation within the envelope assembly resulting from vapor diffusion.

Continuous insulation is defined in ASHRAE 90.1, Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings, as:

“Insulation that is continuous across all structural members without thermal bridges other than fasteners and service openings. It is installed on the interior, exterior, or is integral to any opaque surface of the building envelope.”

Notably, this requirement eliminates the use of fiberglass batts installed between wall studs as the sole means of insulation, which had been common practice in light construction for decades. Such insulation can still be used, but a continuous insulation installed over the studs, such as rigid foam, must also be applied.

Types of rigid foam insulation

When choosing rigid foam insulation for CI, it’s important to keep in mind the performance attributes of the various types: expanded polystyrene (EPS), extruded polystyrene (XPS) and polyisocyanurate (ISO).

EPS

Recognized by its white color (or gray in the case of graphited infused EPS – GPS), EPS insulation has the highest R-value per dollar of the rigid foams. It provides about R-4.6 per inch of thickness (R-5 for GPS). Unlike other rigid foam insulations, EPS retains its R-value throughout its time in service. EPS is the most versatile of rigid insulations because it can be used anywhere in the building envelope – roof, walls, floors and even below grade since it dries quickly.

XPS

Mostly used in walls or below grade applications, XPS manufacturers typically brand their insulations with colors such as pink, blue or green to make them recognizable. XPS provides about R-5 per inch of thickness, and is priced midway between EPS and ISO.

ISO

Typically pale yellow, ISO is mostly (but not exclusively) used in roof assemblies. ISO panels provide up to R-6.5 (aged value) per inch of thickness. ISO R values start at about R-7 per inch, but degrade over time as the thermal-enhancing blowing agents used to make them diffuse out of the material.

Common building envelope applications for each rigid foam insulation type

 

EPS/GPS

XPS

ISO

Roofs

X

 

X

Walls

X

X

X

Below grade

X

X

 

Saving on CI labor and material costs

Rigid foam insulations come in numerous product configurations, with options to help building professionals save on CI installation labor and material costs. For example, several rigid foam insulations are available in “fanfold” bundles. One such faced EPS product is made-up of 50 two-foot by four-foot panels, with each panel attached to its neighbor along one side. The bundles weigh less than 11 pounds each, so it is easy for one person to carry two bundles, which easily unfold to cover up to 200 square feet per bundle.

EPS fanfold bundles require fewer fasteners than other roof and wall insulations, and require about 60% fewer man hours to install than working with individual insulation sheets. As a result, roofers specifically can save up to $25 per square – or about, $12,000 on a 500 square (50,000 square foot) roof. The bundles also help speed insulation in walls and below grade applications.

Other rigid foam options speed insulation on roof recovers of standing seam metal roofs, building up sloped roofs, and providing insulation and drainage on below grade walls, among other applications. Check with your insulation supplier for available options.

Conclusion

Each iteration of the energy code becomes more stringent, but with numerous rigid foam insulation types on the market, it is not difficult to meet the IECC’s 2012 CI requirement.

Michael McAuley is the President of Insulfoam. McAuley has more than 20 years of experience in building material sales and production management, including 14 years at Insulfoam's sister company, Versico Roofing Systems, as the National Sales Manager and General Manager.  www.insulfoam.com



View(336) or Add Comments(0)

Safe Handling and Lifting: An Employer’s Responsibility

Posted on 8/29/2016 2:11 PM by Tom Davison

It’s an employer’s responsibility to ensure the safety of their staff in the workplace. Without having the proper procedures for lifting and handling heavy goods in place, your staff could be at risk of injury, resulting in lost working days for your business.

The United States Department of Labour’s Materials Handling and Storage literature explains the hazards and shows how employers can prevent injury, but many issues can be averted by following some simple guidelines:

The Hazards

The most common hazards posed to US workers include:

  • Lifting heavy or bulky items
  • Falling objects
  • Improperly stacked items
  • Using equipment incorrectly or without the correct training

Depending on the severity of the incident, these hazards can lead to serious injuries ranging from cuts and bruises to strains, fractures and – in some cases even death. As an employer or building manager, it’s your duty to ensure your staff are protected from these hazards.

Reduce the Need

Of course, if your staff aren’t picking up and moving heavy loads, there’s a minimal chance of injury through manual handling. Investing in specialized lifting and handling equipment is one way of doing so, as it allows staff to move the load without physical exertion.

Depending on the equipment required, this investment can be costly. However, when you weigh up the benefits, like improved staff welfare and reduced absences, it is a no-brainer. Remember, specialized equipment can be a hazard in itself if correct training is not given, so always ensure your staff know how to use the machinery properly.

Reduce the Risk

Because not every instance of manual handling can be avoided, employers should carry out a risk assessment to determine the level of danger and potential injuries that staff members face. Once the risks have been identified, you should ensure your staff are fully capable of safely carrying out the task.

Delivering training on the correct procedures to follow when lifting or moving items will give them the knowledge they need to stay safe in the workplace. Developing a manual handling policy will help ensure all staff are equipped with the right information.

Monitor the Changes

If an employee complains of an injury or health problem, you should make changes to the way they work with regards to manual handling. After implementing these changes, you should monitor the situation to ensure they have been positive. Creating a simple survey or regularly catching up with the staff member will help you find out whether their symptoms have improved and which particular task caused it. Not only will you improve your relationship with the staff member, you will be able to prevent similar problems from occurring in the future.

Tom Davison is Sales Team Leader at Slingsby. He can be reached at thomas.davison@slingsby.com

 



View(324) or Add Comments(0)

Get featured on Buildings Buzz! Contact Keith Evanson for more information.