Industry News




07/12/2012

Are you getting what the R-value specified and paid for?

By Darrell Smith, PE, RRC

 

The building code prescribed R-values for above deck roof insulation will be increasing again in the near future once the building code agencies adopt the 2012 ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers) criteria. For Zones 4 and 5 the R-value will need to be R-25, Zone 6 – R-30 and Zones 7 and 8 up to R-35.

 


ASHRAE Climate Zone Map

 

Polyisocynaurate insulation is one of the more commonly used insulation types in the roofing industry. Most manufacturers of polyisocyanurate insulation use the long-term thermal resistance (LTTR) method of determination. LTTR method is defined by ASTM C1303, “Standard Test Method for Predicting Long-Term Thermal Resistance of Closed-Cell Foam Insulation.” The LTTR method provides for thin-slicing test specimens, which accelerates their aging process.  The specimens’ R-value is tested at a 75 degree Fahrenheit (F) laboratory condition at various defined times producing an R-value versus time relationship. The resulting LTTR is calculated as a 15-year time-weighted average of the tested values and it closely approximates the R-value after five years of aging under controlled laboratory conditions.

Although the LTTR method of R-value determination and reporting may be appropriate for laboratory analysis, research comparison and procurement purposes, NRCA (National Roofing Contractors Association) does not consider use of LTTR to be appropriate for design and in-service purposes.1 This position is consistent with NRCA’s longstanding position that the published R-values for polyisocyanurate and polyurethane foams are not consistent with actual in-service performances of these products.

When designers use polyisocyanurate insulation, NRCA recommends they determine their thermal calculations using an in-service R-value of 5.0 per inch thickness in heating conditions and 5.6 per inch thickness in cooling conditions. Designers should use the R-value for heating conditions or cooling conditions based on the predominant condition for the climate where the building being considered is located. The following table provides LTTR and NRCA recommended design R-values for commonly available thicknesses of polyisocyanurate insulation.  

 

Polyisocyanurate

Thickness,

inches                           LTTR              NRCA Recommended

                                                            Design R-values                       

                                                            Heating Conditions      Cooling Conditions

1.0                               6.0                               5.0                               5.6

1.25                             7.5                               6.3                               7.0

1.5                               9.0                               7.5                               8.4

1.75                             10.5                             8.8                               9.8

2.0                               12.1                             10.0                             11.2

2.3                               14.0                             11.5                             12.9

2.5                               15.3                             12.5                             14.0

Another factor to consider when specifying the R-value for a roofing project is the fact that installation of the insulation with a metal fastener (screw) through the entire thickness of the insulation produces a thermal bridge that reduces the effective R-value even more. A study published in 1986 shows that installation of a metal fastener with a metal cap creates and R-value reduction of 3% for 2 inch thickness

up to 8% for 6 inch thickness.2 This is based on a typical fastener density of one fastener per 2 square feet of board area for a fully adhered membrane application.

 


Figure for thermal resistance reduction

 

An example of the “true” R-value of an R-25 insulation system that may be seen in specifications for the Chicago area would be a layer of 2.3 inch and 1.75 inches of polyisocyanurate insulation.  Both layers would be mechanically fastened from the top layer into a metal deck. Using just the LTTR method this provides the code required R-value.

 

Chicago is considered a heating climate. Using the NRCA recommended R-value would only result in a value 20.3. Further reduction of the “true” R-value would include a 7% reduction per the 1986 study. This results in an actual design R-value of 18.9, far less than the code required and what the client thought they purchased.

 

Both of these factors can play into the direction the construction industry is going with the analysis of the “projected design” energy savings versus the actual energy savings of the constructed project. Designers would be prudent to take these factors into consideration for such projects as well as all projects. One way to minimize the R-value loss of fastening insulation to a metal deck would be to only fasten the bottom layer with the fastener and attach the upper layers with adhesive or bitumen. Doing this according to the 1986 study “the reduction in overall thermal resistance is about of factor of three less than that for the case in which the metal fastener penetrates the entire insulation layer”.2

 

 

 

Darrell Smith, PE, RRC is Civil Engineer - Building Envelope/Roof Consultant

REFERENCES

1.         NRCA Roofing Manual: Membrane Roof Systems-2011, National Roofing Contractors Association

2.         “Burch, Douglas M., “A Heat Transfer Analysis of Metal Fasteners in Low-Slope Roofs,” ASTM STP 959, 1986

 


Visit our website today to learn about the design flexibility of a Morton building and the endless possibilities of partnering with our designBUILD team.


Wood construction is both cost and energy efficient. Check out Morton Buildings and our designBUILD team online today to discover all the benefits of post-frame construction.

When choosing a metal-clad building for your next construction project, consider Morton Buildings, Inc., and their designBUILD team, we’ll make your dream a reality. 

We Can Help You Reduce Energy by 30%

Our mission is to help our customers manage their buildings' energy costs, improve reliability, and enhance performance while having a positive impact on the environment.
CLICK HERE to find out how.


Visit our website today to learn about the design flexibility of a Morton building and the endless possibilities of partnering with our designBUILD team.


Wood construction is both cost and energy efficient. Check out Morton Buildings and our designBUILD team online today to discover all the benefits of post-frame construction.

When choosing a metal-clad building for your next construction project, consider Morton Buildings, Inc., and their designBUILD team, we’ll make your dream a reality. 

We Can Help You Reduce Energy by 30%

Our mission is to help our customers manage their buildings' energy costs, improve reliability, and enhance performance while having a positive impact on the environment.
CLICK HERE to find out how.


 
comments powered by Disqus
07/02/2015

Sustainable parking leaders recognized.

07/01/2015

Design ‘scatters’ sound without affecting aerodynamics.

06/30/2015

Survey shows lack of concrete commitment to efficiency improvements.

06/29/2015

Guideline will protect building water systems.

06/26/2015

Development could mitigate urban heat island effect.

06/25/2015

New web application can identify energy savings opportunities.

06/24/2015

Report shows refrigerants could reduce GHG emissions, energy use.

06/23/2015

Sustainable design tied to strong financial performance.

06/22/2015

Human wellbeing guidelines grow throughout North America.

06/19/2015

Larger, private buildings now included in rankings.

06/18/2015

Diversion rates increase nearly 10% in 2013.

06/17/2015
Study shows lack of preparedness, suggests improvements to increase resiliency.
06/15/2015

Surveyed workers feel unsafe, doubt employer readiness for weather events. 

06/12/2015

Better Buildings Challenge improvements demonstrate energy savings.

06/11/2015

New technology provides privacy and sunlight.

06/10/2015

Program will provide best practices, green certification for landscape design.

06/09/2015

Improve recycling up to 20% with an easy switch.

06/08/2015

OSHA and Health Canada to improve hazard communications for worker safety.

06/04/2015

Lighting, building automation retrofits show highest rate of return.

06/03/2015

New OSHA guide to ensure fair treatment, safe working conditions.

Page 1 of 54
FirstPrevious[1]2345678910NextLast

Sponsored Links