TEM_0517_Geothermal

How California Plans to Make Geothermal More Economically Feasible

April 18, 2017

California Energy Commission funds two geothermal research projects.

Held back by the costs associated with harnessing it, geothermal power provides only about 6% of California’s total power. Scientists at the Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory are investigating how to make geothermal energy more accessible and affordable through projects funded by the California Energy Commission.

California’s unique geologic characteristics are conducive to studying geothermal in more applications than in other regions of the U.S. Moreover, this abundance of viable geothermal conditions provides a solution to the state’s goal of generating half of its electricity from renewables by 2030.

The first project will improve visualizing where and how fluids move underground, and the second will develop flexible geothermal systems that integrate with other renewable energy sources.

By placing seismic recorders at the Geysers, the world’s largest geothermal field, researchers from Berkeley Lab will track fluid flow in fractured geothermal reservoirs, which could make the process of finding and making wells more cost-effective.

“If they can increase the likelihood of getting a productive well every time they drill, it would be huge,” says Lawrence Hutchings, a Berkeley Lab microearthquake imaging specialist who has worked in geothermal fields worldwide. “More than 10% of California’s total renewable energy capacity comes from geothermal, so the potential impact of this technology is exciting.”

The other Berkeley Lab project has a goal of enabling conversion of geothermal production to flexible-mode production, which would allow geothermal to supplement other renewable energy sources like wind and solar.

Researchers will adapt two already existing modeling tools for wellbore and geothermal reservoir integrity to integrate with geomechanical tools into an improved thermal-hydrological-mechanical-chemical (THMC) model to address technical challenges.

“This will provide the necessary tools for investigating all the challenges related to flexible-mode production and predict short- and long-term impacts,” says Berkeley Lab scientist Jonny Rutqvist. “The advantages to California are many, including greater grid reliability, increased safety and lower greenhouse gas emissions.”

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Buildings, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

Building Better Schools

Download this digital resource to better understand the challenges and opportunities in designing and operating educational facilities for safety, sustainability, and performance...

Tips to Keep Facility Management on Track

How do you plan to fill the knowledge gap as seasoned facility managers retire or leave for new opportunities? Learn about the latest strategies including FM tech innovations ...

The Beauty & Benefits of Biophilic Design in the Built Environment

Biophilic design is a hot trend in design, but what is it and how can building professionals incorporate these strategies for the benefits of occupants? This eHandbook offers ...

The Benefits of Migrating from Analog to DMR Two-Way Radios

Are you still using analog two-way radios? Download this white paper and discover the simple and cost-effective migration path to digital DMR radios that deliver improved audio...