Are LED Downlights Economically Viable?

June 22, 2016

4 key field results from the GSA’s Green Proving Ground tests.

One-for-one LED replacements for fluorescent downlights can save nearly 40% in lighting-related energy use, according to a field study conducted by the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) on behalf of the GSA’s Green Proving Ground program.

Tested in three GSA buildings in Dallas, Philadelphia and Auburn, WA, the LED replacement lamps used in the study were 4-pin, non-dimmable 13W models that use the existing ballast of the 26W CFL bulbs they replace. The retrofits yielded four key discoveries:

1) Light uniformity differed between CFL and LED products, which the GSA notes are “typically an artifact of the directional nature of the LED technology and how it is affected by the specific geometry of the existing downlight fixture.” The open lobbies in the Dallas and Auburn buildings saw improvement in uniformity, but the corridors in Dallas and Philadelphia noted a decrease. However, occupant survey responses didn’t reveal any evidence of concerns over the changes.

2) Installation was relatively simple, according to installer responses received by the PNNL research team. “This product characteristic should be relevant to all applications because installation of this product does not vary with differences in sites or locations,” the study authors explain.

3) A payback of 2.9 years was possible with the LED products used in the field tests. Greater energy savings resulting in a quicker payback may be possible with dimmable versions that require less power. “A worst-case scenario would be one in which the CFL ballast failed soon after the LED lamp was installed, which could result in a simple payback of 7.1 years, but this is unlikely,” the study explains. “Any simple payback is likely to become even shorter as the price of LED products continues to fall.” Areas with the highest energy costs saw the most savings, but even places with relatively low energy rates around 6 cents per kWh found the LED retrofits cost-effective.

4) Occupants were generally receptive to the new lighting. Their response can be generalized to most other applications because downlight fixture formats across applications are so similar, the study authors say. Pre-retrofit surveys indicated that the existing fluorescent system was acceptable and this rating did not vary significantly after the retrofit.
The retrofit trial represents a next step from a 2013 study on the indoor lighting market for federal facilities that revealed roughly 95,000 CFL-based downlights in the GSA’s building portfolio. Downlights represent a relatively small percentage of the total fixtures, but presented an opportunity to save 5.7 GWh and over $600,000 per year if all 95,000 CFLs were replaced with solid-state technology like LEDs.

One-to-one LED replacements are also available for fluorescent troffers.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Buildings, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

Building Better Schools

Download this digital resource to better understand the challenges and opportunities in designing and operating educational facilities for safety, sustainability, and performance...

Tips to Keep Facility Management on Track

How do you plan to fill the knowledge gap as seasoned facility managers retire or leave for new opportunities? Learn about the latest strategies including FM tech innovations ...

The Beauty & Benefits of Biophilic Design in the Built Environment

Biophilic design is a hot trend in design, but what is it and how can building professionals incorporate these strategies for the benefits of occupants? This eHandbook offers ...

The Benefits of Migrating from Analog to DMR Two-Way Radios

Are you still using analog two-way radios? Download this white paper and discover the simple and cost-effective migration path to digital DMR radios that deliver improved audio...